Oh why do I get myself into these situations…. the gorgeous Jane Lewty asked if I’d contribute to a book on porn. Since Jane moved to the USA to take up an academic post there I haven’t seen much of her, and I figured if I said yes to the sex assignment it would mean we’d have to meet for a drink or three when she was back in the UK for vacations – to discuss the progress of my paper of course! However, having failed to write a word so far, I was forced to blow Jane off when she was in London for the winter solstice…. Now the 1 February deadline is looming and I still haven’t done a stroke of work on this. I find it a lot easier to produce pornography than write about it. I don’t even have a title yet, which is why I need your help. And if anyone has an unpublished academic paper on porn they could let me use, that would be even better! Underneath this is the original call for papers…. so you can bounce ideas into the comments, or if you have a usable unpublished paper on the subject it might be better to private message me via the webmail form on the main part of this site. All help appreciated!
Pornotopias: Image, Apocalypse, Desire
eds. Louis Armand, Jane Lewty, Andrew Mitchell
Prague: Litteraria Pragensia, 2008
Bodily existence is an existence lived in constant fascination with a world beyond one’s reach. Embodiment, desire, metaphor. To exist on the verge of nonexistence. In the headlong pursuit of the real, of the other. Of the base materiality of the world, of religious hypothesis, of absolute relativity. Every utopia is a pornography, a recrudescence and pathological disillusionment, a lure into the vortex—paradoxical annulment of pure reason, compulsion, repetition, consumption.
A fact of bodily existence is to know that the body is our most complex and multi-faceted machine in a world of incessant technological progress. The body is a marvel of engineering; it is the outward face of primal nature; it is a disgusting vessel in which to house the soul; it is a primitive device, fragile and disposable. Bodies are re-produced, experimented upon to the limits of their tolerance, dissected and debated to every last cell, mended, prosthetically enhanced, moralised, abused and adored. The interface with the world we live in means that the body is always laid open to scrutiny without ever simply constituting some thing within our grasp: it is the site where violence and metaphysics interchange, technicity and catatonia, the sublime and the grotesque.
The body cannot be neutral or indifferent. Its design is such that it must respond to both exterior challenge and interior impulse. Our means of survival, the sex act, galvanizes the body into a unique state of existence, which, though transient, becomes the essence of being; the concentration of an idea, the heightening of sense, the ultimate dissolution.
How to write this purposeful transformation? How to write this instantaneous, ephemeral shattering of perception? This is the task of pornography. Our project will present the body in its most extreme of forms and behaviour, all of which demonstrate the human attempt to satisfy, and solve, the oft-inchoate needs of our psychology and physicality. We seek papers which deal with pornography as condition, symptom, addiction, spectacle, product, simulacrum. Above all as a fundamentalism embedded in the very structures of representation, knowledge, non-knowledge and the unpresentable.
Contributions of up to 6000 words, including images (jpeg 300dpi), should be sent to the editors. Final deadline for contributions: 1 February 2009. So we have a week!
And while you’re at it don’t forget to check – http://www.stewarthomesociety.org/ – you know it makes (no) sense!
Comments
Comment by David Kelso on 2009-01-23 12:34:35 +0000
Forgotten your own work Homie? You should just write about that, it would be true to the spirit of porn…
“Cunt by Stewart Home. The narrator of Cunt is David Kelso. He’s a cunt in search of cunt. He’s also a writer who claims to be so lacking in imagination that his fiction isn’t fiction. Kelso is completing a trilogy in which he describes tracking down and shagging the first thousand women he bedded. Despite boasting that he is completely uncreative, Kelso dreams up some seriously Machiavellian scenarios in order to get into the knickers of various women he hasn’t seen for years. Kelso is also disarmingly candid about the fact that he sometimes fakes his results. Such dissimulation raises serious doubts about Kelso’s reliability as a narrator.”
Comment by Mario Mentrup on 2009-01-23 13:03:34 +0000
WE ARE HOOKERS FOR JESUS? (70s ideal for revolutionary women and revolutionary sex of the cult group CHILDREN OF GOD)
WE ARE ALL PROSTITUTES? (80s state-of-mind remixed for the 2000s)
Mario Mentrup
Berlin/Madrid
January -March 2008
There was this one night at Babie Deinhoffs , a gay/lesbian bar in the todays hip-district of our town: Berlin-KREUZBERG ( means
americans & scandinavians buy appartments and houses like crazy here). Yes indeed Barbie Deinhoffs is a wild Bar and a silly Bar, crowded with nightlife-tourists wating for doors to open at Berghain’ s( Inscene dancefloor-place with a darkroom for everybody and Hardcore Hip-doorkeepers), and of course the usual Barbie Deinhoffs crowd: drugged and drunken egomaniacs; be they gay, straight or porn.
I had a big laugh watching this young -musican- guy trying to discuss the lines “WE ARE ALL PROSTITUTES” by the 80sAct Pop Group with two friends of mine. My two friends, veryveryvery drunken ladies, one a struggling actrice, the other a quite popular Music Act, were not amused at all. The actrice pulled the minimal-electropop-artist from his chair outta the Bar into the dark of cold Berlin night, yelling at him: WE AAARRR NOOO PROSTITUTES!!!!! The guy tried to get in again, wanting to explain himself, to make his point clear: “The line of the song was so full of truth, bitter and hard to swallow, but anyway true and…”
blablablablablablablabla……….
must the noise have been the ladies heard. No Mercy this time! Now they were two chicks gettin on him, kicking him out,” Fucker! Fuck yourself, Pervert!!! Damn you!!!! callin us Prostitutes!!” 2 – 3 times.” Fucker! Fuck yourself!”The guy had to give up and go.
People in the Bar went on being ego here ego there, babble and drink. I had to giggle real hard… I ordered another Beer.Yes FUCK yourself!! The damn drunken chicks had been right: neither they were prostitutes nor the guy because he was only a twenty/thirtysomethin Clubber/Electronicpopmusician wating to get signed by a label again.
So maybe the guy had felt a sensation of self-exploitation in front of a lower middle class Labelchef with typical GERMAN ANGST (the shit ANGST is nowadays more contagious than AIDS) but no!!! the chicks were – because of primitively sheer serious drunkenness not able to follow the guys’ argument- absolutely right :”We are No Prostiutes…”
The Night went on and the old 80s paranoia- formed lines of POP GOUP had become sour.
2 or 3 months later I had a night in Madrid, a Bar crowded with artists, students and the usual Hip-Gayscene. I was invited by the german Goethe Institute to create art-for-hire (how stupid can you go? Yo!!! Hey but it’s the modern times? Iam gettin 43..Iam too old for Rock n Roll and especially ART goes POP) THATS WHAT I THOUGHT… A young british artist was playing Cds and Downloads- VERY sophisticated New York ..Iceland…Finland…Rock/electro/Kraut/Prog- as this spanish young Lady came to me and invited me for a double Gin Tonic…I remembered seeing her at the Goethe Institut and she told me she was doing German classes because she wanted to graduate at a Berlin actors school. She ordered some more Drinks, asking me about any manouvres and tricks how- to- become -an- actor BLABLABLA… She saw me lookin at the huge glass of Gin Tonic. She must have read my thoughts: How-expensive-this night-would-become.
Her tone suddenly changed from an innocent art girl’s voice to a darker tone degrading me and my few euros in my jeans and damn all masculinity in general. Those were her words: “Don’t you have a problem. I got enough money. The men think iam so sweet… They think they fuck me, I fuck them, I fuck old men…Pays my rent, so don’t you worry!” Having said that, she ordered another round of Gin Tonic. The night went on,, We were visiting some more Bars in Madrid. Finally i found my ass totally pissed in her roommates bedroom. A former topmodel for topmagazines. Now she was the nude-model of another deranged example of masculinity.
I woke up with a BIG hangover, but i pulled myself together. I didnt want to miss my plane back to Berlin. Since my arrival in Berlin i stayed then two weeks at home, not seeing a damn person, being sick of it all: No Money in my pocket. Street philosopy! In- Scene! Degradation! I went down to the cafe’ in my street and read an article about those many many young women in Paris and Rome studying and financing their livestyle as escort girls or webcamgirls. We all know Youporn, pornotube etc is giving the professional porn industry a big headache. The californian burlesque strippers SUICIDE GIRLS were the hottest thing last year ago.
It seems like in the 20s and 30s in Europe or like after WW II: callgirls and hookers, cabaret dancers organizing themselves. A lot of of prostitution was also going on in WIRTSCHAFTSWUNDER Deutschland 50s and 60S . I remember as a kid listening to the damn jokes the adults made: First looking at the new born child then looking right into the face of the father , they said: “Doesnt really look like you, ha?!!!
Those were the days…
The ordinary uptight guy with no money extra in his pocket and whose aim was not to be a gangster or a pimp had only one choice.KEEP THE SECRET. Never ask your wife more questions than needed. Because he had no right to do so. If the tiny soldier couldnt bring enough money home to feed his wife and the family: No questions allowed. There is a whole literature genre about this situation: the most striking example is the novel CHINCHILLA by Renate Rasp, published in the 70s, during the Rise and Fall of sexual liberation in German Federal Republic (BRD)
Porno is a degrading media and even like so many TV-gameshows or Youtube-culture today it is a medium where the (male) Spectator/Voyeur can get a feeling of superiority watching others – in pornflicks mainly women – being abused and dehumanized or via youtube: celebs making asses of themselves…. Remember the silly giggles of the MTV cartoon characters BEAVIS AND BUTTHEAD? Neoliberalism..Globalisation is empowering the act of dehumanizing ourselves….EVERYWHERE!!! Not only in Damaskus, in Moskau and Bukarest , Tokyo EVERWHERE… It means for Daddy that there is no Dualism any more, no right and wrong, no Good and Evil, no pussy outdoors and meals at home..No more “la maman et la putain”: It s your daughter!!! Remembering the frustrating Filmscene in MIIKE TAKASHIS VISITOR Q the cheap/sicko Adaption of Pasolinis TEOREMA : the Daddy, a customer of a LOVE HOTEL sees in the mirror that he’s fucking his own daughter.
The Phallus has been in possession of the sun god and the state. No longer. Now dark powers expose the male security: rootless cosmopolitan elements.
Foxes, Hyenas, Eagles, Witches disguised as human beings: Hustlers!
The young musician guy from Berlin will be lucky as long as he can be sure the girls of his peer-group are no prostitutes, because he can’t pay their rent anyway, with or without being a Hustler. But anyway. Maybe “Its the Beginning of a New Age” (Velvet Underground) or the decline of an “Empire” (Antonio Negri). But still now it forces us to rethink our sober- nonsmoking- clean -middleclass ideals of Motherhood Fatherhood Property Sex Bodypolitcs Sensuality Relationship Family Marriage Jealousy Possession Obssession Perversity Normality Love and Lust
And Me Myself and I?
i decided no to go out these days. Only if i really need to. Businesswise (with some money in my pocket) or if i am really longing for another hangover!
See the pictures:
MYSPACE, FLICKR, BLOG, WEB 2.O, YOUTUBE M A D E U S!
– Stewart Home,London, literary Agent Provocateur, Age: 46, flirting with flickr exhibitionism
– Sarah Maple, London, Artist, Age: 23, pushes her career in the artworld with narcissm provoking the british/islam community. Satire?
– Vincent Gallo, L.A/ NY, Celebrity and Star Persona, Age: 46, sells his sperm and himself as an escort servant for ladies via Ebay and his website. Satire? No! The right -wing fellow claims to be a Hustler
-Naomi Elisabeth,San Diego, Music and Performance Act, Age: ?, is selling her product and herself via satirical erotic Pics. Satire? Showbiz!!!
-Mario Mentrup, Berlin, thats me, Actor, Perfomer, Filmmaker Age:42, i did this photosession satirically, but even more to pose for the myspace-Site of our MusicAct PASADENA PROJEKT. More pics? Keep you informed
Comment by Sigmund Freud on 2009-01-23 13:37:45 +0000
The oral stage begins at birth, when the oral cavity is the primary focus of libidal energy. The child, of course, preoccupies himself with nursing, with the pleasure of sucking and accepting things into the mouth. The oral character who is frustrated at this stage, whose mother refused to nurse him on demand or who truncated nursing sessions early, is characterized by pessimism, envy, suspicion and sarcasm. The overindulged oral character, whose nursing urges were always and often excessively satisfied, is optimistic, gullible, and is full of admiration for others around him. The stage culminates in the primary conflict of weaning, which both deprives the child of the sensory pleasures of nursing and of the psychological pleasure of being cared for, mothered, and held. The stage lasts approximately one and one-half years.
Comment by Paul McCartney on 2009-01-23 13:39:42 +0000
Your stuff is a groove sensation, Sig..you should definitely enter the competition with that kind of HOT MF sheeeeit!
Comment by Sigmund Freud on 2009-01-23 13:40:44 +0000
At one and one-half years, the child enters the anal stage. With the advent of toilet training comes the child’s obsession with the erogenous zone of the anus and with the retention or expulsion of the feces. This represents a classic conflict between the id, which derives pleasure from expulsion of bodily wastes, and the ego and superego, which represent the practical and societal pressures to control the bodily functions. The child meets the conflict between the parent’s demands and the child’s desires and physical capabilities in one of two ways: Either he puts up a fight or he simply refuses to go. The child who wants to fight takes pleasure in excreting maliciously, perhaps just before or just after being placed on the toilet. If the parents are too lenient and the child manages to derive pleasure and success from this expulsion, it will result in the formation of an anal expulsive character. This character is generally messy, disorganized, reckless, careless, and defiant. Conversely, a child may opt to retain feces, thereby spiting his parents while enjoying the pleasurable pressure of the built-up feces on his intestine. If this tactic succeeds and the child is overindulged, he will develop into an anal retentive character. This character is neat, precise, orderly, careful, stingy, withholding, obstinate, meticulous, and passive-aggressive. The resolution of the anal stage, proper toilet training, permanently affects the individual propensities to possession and attitudes towards authority. This stage lasts from one and one-half to two years.
Comment by Ringo Starr on 2009-01-23 13:42:08 +0000
Yeah, yeah….that’s it…..mummy daddy me, mummy daddy me, mummy daddy me…all the way down the line!
Comment by Sigmund Freud on 2009-01-23 13:43:20 +0000
The phallic stage is the setting for the greatest, most crucial sexual conflict in Freud’s model of development. In this stage, the child’s erogenous zone is the genital region. As the child becomes more interested in his genitals, and in the genitals of others, conflict arises. The conflict, labeled the Oedipus complex (The Electra complex in women), involves the child’s unconscious desire to possess the opposite-sexed parent and to eliminate the same-sexed one.
In the young male, the Oedipus conflict stems from his natural love for his mother, a love which becomes sexual as his libidal energy transfers from the anal region to his genitals. Unfortunately for the boy, his father stands in the way of this love. The boy therefore feels aggression and envy towards this rival, his father, and also feels fear that the father will strike back at him. As the boy has noticed that women, his mother in particular, have no penises, he is struck by a great fear that his father will remove his penis, too. The anxiety is aggravated by the threats and discipline he incurs when caught masturbating by his parents. This castration anxiety outstrips his desire for his mother, so he represses the desire. Moreover, although the boy sees that though he cannot posses his mother, because his father does, he can posses her vicariously by identifying with his father and becoming as much like him as possible: this identification indoctrinates the boy into his appropriate sexual role in life. A lasting trace of the Oedipal conflict is the superego, the voice of the father within the boy. By thus resolving his incestuous conundrum, the boy passes into the latency period, a period of libidal dormancy.
Comment by The Real Tessie on 2009-01-23 13:47:59 +0000
Take a sheet of glass and put it in front of the preclear — clear, very clear glass — which is supercooled, preferably about a -100 centigrade. You got that? Supercooled, you know? And then put the preclear right in front of this supercooled sheet of glass and suddenly shove his face into the glass. Now, that’s pretty good. I mean, that was developed about five billion years ago by a whole-track psychiatrist […]. The mechanism of brainwashing which I gave you, with supercold mechanisms and so forth, is very well known, was used very extensively in the Maw Confederation of the Sixty-third Galaxy. They had a total psychiatric control of all of their officers and executives, and when they got tired of them they used this specific method of brainwashing!!
Comment by Ringo Starr on 2009-01-23 13:49:05 +0000
Paradiddle! Paradiddle!
Comment by Steve Marinucci on 2009-01-23 13:55:13 +0000
Paul McCartney will perform in a special benefit concert April 4 at Radio City Music Hall for the David Lynch Foundation, according to an announcement on the foundation’s website. The site says the concert will help support the foundation’s program to teach children transcendental mediation. What’s strange here is that this hasn’t been mentioned anywhere else that we know of.
Comment by Paul McCartney on 2009-01-23 13:58:45 +0000
I’ve got an idea. I want to write a piece on the Maharishi’s seduction technique with Mia Farrow. The only thing is that I’ll havew to use a pseudonym and I havent been thinking of any new ones for ages. I tell you what, Homes…if I knock this up on the back of a stamp that I didn’t use while writing the screenplay for ‘Give My Regards to Broad Street’, would you submit it under your name???? It would be a groove…
I’ll ask Michael K as well as I’m going over to smoke rocks with him this afternoon in DC
Comment by David Lynch on 2009-01-23 14:04:45 +0000
In today’s world of fear and uncertainty, every child should have one class period a day to dive within himself and experience the field of silence—bliss—the enormous reservoir of energy and intelligence that is deep within all of us. This is the way to save the coming generation.
I have been “diving within” through the Transcendental Meditation technique for over 30 years. It has changed my life, my world. I am not alone. Millions of other people of all ages, religions, and walks of life practice the technique and enjoy incredible benefits.
Comment by George Harrison on 2009-01-23 14:05:57 +0000
Dave’s right. TM (smokes) rocks!!
Comment by The Real Tessie on 2009-01-23 14:09:59 +0000
It has never been any part of my plans to regulate or to attempt to regulate the private lives of individuals. Whenever this has occurred, it has not resulted in any improved condition … Therefore all former rules, regulations and polices relating to the sexual activities of Scientologists are cancelled.
Comment by mistertrippy on 2009-01-23 14:10:00 +0000
Are the works of Sigmund Freud pornography for the desperate??????
Comment by The Real Tessie on 2009-01-23 14:11:11 +0000
It can be observed that the eating of living flesh or live cells delivers a kind of admiration to the taste, and it can be observed that under torture, duress of all kinds, the tortured one will suddenly, if degradedly, admire his torturer.
Comment by The Inauthentic Tessie on 2009-01-23 17:10:14 +0000
LXXVIII
The saturation of 3Dimensions (1Trimension) on a 2D surface- ie the illusion of prodimensionality was what gave Realist painting its force and it is no coincidence that the realist classic painting ‘The Origin of the World’ is the most overtly pornographic paintings in the history of European painting. This painting – and the key to the power of Realism and to the later Social Realism and even Anarcho-Realism – is their value or semantic space that they create or delineate in relation to the real people who create it. While Les Demoiselles D’Avignon introduced African conceptions of beauty, The Origin of the World was painted for an Ottoman ambassador, who commissioned it. Both works, however were paintings of women as subject, by men – ie as the object of a man’s gaze.
LXXIX
Contrary to the slogan ‘pornography is the theory, rape is the practce’, it is masturbation – as well as of course commodification – which is the practice of pornography and it is a gross oversimplification to equate masturbation with rape under the rubric of ‘abuse’. The bourgeoisie in seeking the absolution of commodity relations want to abolish the concept of rape by abolishing the concept of concent – ie the active perspective and expression or value/s of the worker – and replace it with a monetary value. Both masturbation and pornography are dedimensional and both do eventually tend towards rape, which is an expression of comodification and psychopathic spectacular geometry – ie the absolute dedimensionalisation of humanity and a human being to one point – in this case a penetrated orifice of the victim and the point of orgasm for the perpetrator. It is a banality to state as ‘I’ or ‘we’ must, that all sex tends towards masturbation and all masturbation tends towards sex – ie while porn and masturbation require dedimensionalisation which tends towards rape, sex requires a opening up of new dimensions – it is poly and prodimensional and therefore is based upon the uncovering of new dimensions and points of perspective. However this corresponds with the shift from chattel (actual) slavery to wage slavery – the individual worker is not reduced to just one figure in terms of value but an infinite and ever increasing range of valuations as more and more of a workers life becomes commodified.
LXXX
For us then all graphics are pornographics and this includes of course hypergraphics and letters themselves. The dedimensionalism of all ideographical forms and means, including letters, reaches its psychopathic conclusion in 0s and 1s which reduce love to a penetrative function. All language is sexual and its power is in creating forcefields which manipulate and shape behaviour between the poles of birth and death through the construction of an individual point of view based on the visual organ – I. It is areas in this space that is locked and unlocked through an alphabet of bodily positions which are learnt and performed by military intelligence occultists in both the arts of seduction and torture.
LXXXI
The temporal and indeed semantic point of origin ie the proletarian orientation of the creator the alienated owner of the labour must be the vagina of the mother and it is thus a banality also to state that our relationships with our parents are always and already sexual.
LXXXII
We are already moving away here from the patriarchal ruling class perspective of naming a child after the father’s family and we need to push this perspective of labour so that it comes to dominate land as well as capital ownership. The word Proletariat means those whose only property is their sons but for us the proletariat must first own itself and then own its production which is everything.
LXXXIII
The colonies that gained so-called independence, either the ACP, Middle East, Asia or in America have all seen struggle for land between workers and their so-called independent governments. The racial question and polarity between black and white – colour being a union/wahdat or monodimensionality – which has served to obscure the fact that the families or aristocratic ruling class forms have underpinned the domination of capital over the workers. This is why in Africa the colony of South Africa was European dominated – ie European families still had relations in Europe and the individuals had their positioning in a genetic geometry based in Europe. Similarly in Australia the genetic geometry which linked convicts to Europe lasted way after the death of the individuals involved. Just like slaves before them and refugees today – people are not bound by nationality or passport – or even family, genetics or blood. A proletarian perspective takes in origin in space, time and value (identity) but also movement throughout these fields. It takes in the collaborative production of every worker we share production and consumption with but must always begin in the current space time and value.
LXXXIX
A return to land property ownership – be it customary, tribal or traditional – all returns to previous ruling class structures – ie of old families – eg in genealogies – rather than new proletarian associations based on proletarian perspectives which are international and open in temporal dimensions. However the perspective of the eye in the triangle is not countered simply by the eye in the heart. Their conjunction in the star of David is complemented by other star systems eg NATO or even the double cross of the UK. It is only through the continuous introduction of new perspectives that we can break out of the forcefields of power ie we can neither defer our struggle to another or struggle for any other ourselves. Revolutionary redimensioalisation is the entanglement of all our struggles.
XC
Geneology provides a 2 dimensionalisation of the person – along routes in time and semantic to imprison the worker in a predesigned role – that of mother or daughter. In adopting multiple user names, proletarians have rejected bourgeois identity. However, the enforcement of names goes hand in hand with the control of space and time. To be named is to be already dead. It is the living that name, as this too is the work of the worker.
?
Comment by The Man With No Name on 2009-01-23 18:12:18 +0000
I am generally portrayed as an outsider, a mercenary or bounty hunter, or even an outlaw. I am characteristically soft-spoken and laconic, speaking only when necessary, with as few words as possible. My character is an oft-cited example of an anti-hero, although I have a soft spot for people in deep trouble.
Comment by mistertrippy on 2009-01-23 19:50:31 +0000
Wow, now I can really dig The Inauthentic Tessie, come back doll all is forgiven, I promise I won’t lock you in the cupboard, I’ll sit you on my knee and practice my ventriloquism… Tessie Talk the best ventriloquist doll in the world!
Comment by The Radically Inauthentic Real Tessie (Now With REAL Custard!) on 2009-01-23 21:47:55 +0000
It’s about time, Buster but now that I’m L Ron Hubbard you no longer have to be man enough to be a woman and through auditing will soon have your dialectics ready for the Olympics
Comment by mistertrippy on 2009-01-24 00:03:30 +0000
So when are you flying home to London and to me????
Comment by Immanuel Kant on 2009-01-24 14:50:08 +0000
A lust is called unnatural when a man is stimulated not by an actual object but by imagining it, thus creating it himself unpurposively. For his fancy engenders a desire contrary to an end of nature and indeed contrary to an end more important even than that of the love of life, since it aims only at preserving the individual, while sexual love aims at the preservation of the whole species.
Comment by mistertrippy on 2009-01-24 18:57:43 +0000
Immanuel Kant was a real pissant
Who was very rarely stable
Heidegger, Heidegger was a boozy beggar
Who could think you under the table
David Hume could out-consume
Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
And Wittgenstein was a beery swine
Who was just as schloshed as Schlegel
Comment by Christopher Nosnibor on 2009-01-28 12:53:23 +0000
Why bother writing a paper when you can plagiarise one, thus saving a lot of time and simultaneously making a comment on the mechanical / formulaic nature of most pornorgraphy?
Comment by mistertrippy on 2009-01-28 22:50:30 +0000
Well I was hoping my readers would do it for me…. but plagiarism is the next best thing…. only slightly more work….