| RE:ACTION #5 WINTER 1996Neither Burnham nor Benda!
 
 DEMOLISH  THEME PARK BRITAIN
 "Reality  is indefinable. The proposition 'whatever is, is real,' although true, does not  help us define reality, or to determine it in any other way, because in 'whatever  is' the 'is' involves being, and being is the same as reality. But the  proposition, though tautologous is not, I think, useless, since it brings  before us the wide denotation of reality." J. McT.  E. McTaggart The Nature Of Existence Volume 1 (Press  Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1927). Treason  and tradition spring from the same etymological root -   tradere; to place, to deliver up, to hand or  give over. To give over to the 'enemy' is treason (traditionem). To give over  to another 'generation' is tradition (traditio). In choosing to 'betray' tradition,  the Neoist Alliance rejects everything reproduced or reproductive, it rejects  all ideologies of development, all realignments, all new adaptations and all  selection. Indeed, the Neoist Alliance rejects the entire panoply of originary  myths and actively participates in their dissolution. The avant-bard has no  programme, it simply seeks to render itself obsolete.
 In her book The Druids (University  Of Wales Press, Cardiff and Connecticut 1966), N. K. Chadwick delineates two  distinct responses within classical society to the Celtic 'tribes' of Gaul and  the British Isles. The Posidonians belittled the barbarous habits of the Celts  and today their views are quite rightly viewed as archaic, although they are  echoed in the anti-Irish diatribes issued by far-Right extremists such as  Richard Hunt, the founder and ideological architect of Green Anarchist. In  contrast to this, the Alexandrian tradition idealised the Celts as 'noble  savages' who were closer to 'nature' than the urbanised citizens of ancient  Greece and Rome. Reactionary clap-trap of the Alexandrian type is still popular  among privileged conservatives whose political commitments can all too easily  degenerate into fascism. Idealisation of the 'primitive' contains within it the  implicit assumption that the very 'civilisation' 'denounced' by Alexandrians is  somehow more 'advanced' than the social forms these creeps pretend to extol.
 
 Rather than being something 'new',  primitivism has a history that stretches back at least three thousand years. It  should go without saying that the current 'generation' of self-styled 'anarcho-primitivists'  (many of whom can be described more accurately as fascists - see The Green  Apocalypse by Luther Blissett and Stewart Home) are largely ignorant of this. John  Moore, an anaemic academic and possibly the leading 'theorist' of 'anarcho-primitivism'  in the UK, bizarrely locates the origin of primitivism 'in the lived experience  of Detroit's inner-city dwellers' (Transgressions 2/3 August 1996). Since Moore's  positions are demolished in a response piece by Luther Blissett, I will not  treat them in any detail here. Obviously, Moore's 'thought', like that of  modern day 'Celticists', represents an enthusiasm for what proponents of 'nature'  mysticism wrongly view as being 'Other'.
 
 It is, of course, a banality to  state that the modern idea of the 'Celtic' is a complete fabrication. This is  patently evident from the markedly different forms 'Celticism' has taken in 'Britain'  and in 'France'. In the UK, middle-class romanticism transformed the Celtic 'fringes'  of the British Isles into places of wish-fulfilment. As a pseudo-inversion of  the actuality of industrialised 'England', the Celtic 'fringe' provided snobs  with healthy holidays well away from the 'vulgar' mass resorts favoured by the  upper-working and lower-middle classes. Celtic tourism is now well established  as a successful service industry whose features include a particularly  nauseating combination of the aesthetic and the 'holy'. Among the 'Celtic' sites  most popular with tourists are the megalithic stone circles to be found  throughout the British Isles, all of which pre-date the arrival of the Celts by  centuries if not millennia! Ironically, although many of those doing the 'Celtic'  tourist trail fly into the UK via Heathrow Airport, few of them seem to be  aware that this complex was constructed on the site of possibly the best  example of a timber built pre-Roman Celtic shrine.
 
 As a highly commodified 'spiritual  pilgrimage', the 'Celtic' tourist trail offers supplicants to Capital a mixture  of Christian and Pagan fetishes, usually combined in a manner that would have  horrified 'earlier' adherents to either 'faith'. The pamphlet of sermons St. Peter's  Chapel Bradwell-On-Sea: Celtic Heroes Of Faith by Martin Wallace (Aquila Celtic  Crafts, Bradwell-On-Sea 1996 pages 26-28) provides a typical example of quasi-Celtic  religious baloney dished up by a 'trendy' vicar: "Brigid was... somebody who  stood on the boundary between material and spiritual wealth. Her adopted father  was a Druid who had had a vision that three angels came and baptised and named  her. As she grew, everything she touched seemed to go well: harvests were full,  herds increased, flocks produced more young than ever, and lots of poor were  helped through her...  she lit a fire,  not only of faith, but also a physical fire. The task of maintaining the flame  of that physical fire was given to twenty particular nuns, including herself,  whose job it was to keep that fire alight as a symbol of faith. After she had  died nineteen nuns traditionally kept that fire aflame, and it was, in fact,  kept alight for a thousand years after her time, until the dissolution of  monasteries. What a powerful symbol!"
 
 Moving on from the semi-Christian to  the fully pagan, the most impressive megalithic sites - Stonehenge and Avebury -  are located in the West Country, well away from the Celtic 'fringe' which  Martin Wallace seems to view as not only extending as far as his coastal parish  in 'Saxon' Essex, but actually culminating there! However, pre-Celtic stone  circles can be found throughout the British Isles, from Cornwall to the Outer  Hebrides. A tourist centre designed to resemble a motorway service station  recently opened beside the supposedly remote stone circle at Callanish on the  Isle Of Lewis. In the Callanish Centre cafe, visitors are sold badly made  cappuccinos and bombarded with New Age music that has a vaguely 'Celtic' flavour.  While the majority of tourists seem to obey the notices at Callanish asking  them to keep to the outer path, elderly local ladies walk straight through the  stones, unmoved by pleas about the preservation of 'our' common heritage.
 
 However, even the Callanish guide  books admit the stones have been 'restored' and at least one of them re-erected  in the 'wrong' position (see, for example, New Light On The Stones Of Callanish  by Gerald and Margaret Ponting, G & M Ponting, Callanish 1984). That said,  the indifferent attitude of the indigenous population stems not from cultural  iconoclasm but their hardcore Presbyterianism. Not only are there no bus or  ferry services in Lewis on a Sunday, even the swings in parks are locked up to  prevent children playing on them. In an equally 'spiritual' fashion, a local  prophet known as the Brahan Seer is said to have predicted that the Isle Of  Lewis would sink into the sea. Tourists are regaled with the theory that this  may refer to the ferry of that name which brings them over from the 'mainland'.  Such legends are the stuff of 'Gaelic' wish-fulfilment.
 
 The majority of place names in Lewis  are derived from Norse rather than Gaelic words, but since both languages sound  'foreign' to the majority of visitors, this is simply more grist to the mill of  the 'Celtic' tourist industry. The fact that a swathe of what is currently  considered to be 'Scotland' at one time belonged to 'Norway' mirrors similar  confusions further south. Even J. D. Mackie in his rabidly nationalistic A  History Of Scotland (Penguin 1964, pages 14-15) had to admit: "When one  considers the great similarity between the terrain of the Scottish Lowlands and  the northern counties of England... it is not easy to see why the Border came  to be where now it is." While the ebb and flow of political power has caused  the border to shift back and forth over the centuries, simultaneously  transforming the national 'status' of Berwick-Upon-Tweed, there are few doubts  about the 'fact' that Holy Island - a few miles to the south of the sometimes 'Scots'  town of Berwick - is 'English'.
 
 According to Magnus Magnusson (cited  on the inside front cover of Holy Island by M Scott Weightman, Pitkin  Pictorials, Andover 1996): "St Aidan, the first bishop of Lindisfarne... kindled  the lamp of Christianity in the north of England. It was a lamp whose rays  would illuminate the civilisation of Western Europe and give Lindisfarne a  Golden Age whose afterglow confers upon the little island still an aura, an  ambience, of remembered grace." In fact, everything about Holy Island is  attractive except for the village of Lindisfarne, with its vile pubs, tea rooms  and gift shops selling tack that various entrepreneurs have commodified as 'Celtic'  crafts. While everywhere in the village there are reminders that one is in the  north of 'England', the Northumbrian petit-bourgeoisie are every bit as heavy  handed in laying claim to the 'Celtic' mantel as their 'Scots' 'cousins'.
 
 Northumbria has at other times been  considered 'Anglo-Saxon' and as Allen J. Frantzen observes in Desire For  Origins: New Language, Old English And Teaching The Tradition (Rutgers  University Press, New Brunswick 1990, pages 22-23): "early Anglo-Saxonists  posited an ideal point, ancient and continuous with the present. We call belief  in such a point 'primitivism', and distinguish two kinds, cultural and  chronological. Cultural primitivists have long portrayed the Anglo-Saxon era as  a time of simple 'natural' social organization and political order. This myth  intersects with (and is not entirely distinct from) chronological primitivism,  which is less concerned with specific social or political organization than  with a generalized view that life in the past was free of inhibition and  restraint. It was chiefly cultural primitivism that inspired early Anglo-Saxonists.  Generations of English and American writers elaborated the myth of an ideal and  innocent Anglo-Saxon culture, and, as if longing for an earthly paradise,  looked back on it as an image of their own beginnings."
 
 To borrow a phrase from the Equi-Phallic  Alliance, 'place' is false and these primitivist 'landscapes' sway on 'stilts'.  In the borders - that is to say in 'Scotland', since only the north side of the  'English' / 'Scottish'  border is  marketed to tourists as 'the' borders, the south side is sold to them as the  north of 'England' - castles and abbeys are the main tourist attractions. War  and religion are thus promoted as quintessentially 'Celtic', when they are  actually a key component within every branded 'variety' of nationalist reaction.  Predictably, Hume Castle remains neglected by those bodies promoting 'Scotland'  as a tourist destination. Although Hume Castle survived Robert the Bruce's  scorched earth policy in the 'borders', Oliver Cromwell experienced no  difficulty in laying it to waste. In the eighteenth-century, William Home built  a fake replacement on the original site. Situated a few miles outside Kelso,  the folly dominates the landscape and looks very impressive from a distance. Close  up, the vastly overstated imitation battlements become an absurdity. There is  no admission charge, no 'Celtic' crafts and the hill-top folly offers a superb  view of the surrounding 'countryside' as it sways on stilts. Beyond a telephone  box, there are no amenities in the adjoining village of Hume, not even a shop!
 
 The 'French' bourgeoisie has had  occasion to take up 'Celticism' and make use of it as the dominant element  within its 'national' ideology. At other times, 'Celticism' has provided a  convenient 'alternative' to a dominant Greco-Latin 'French' identity. The  praise of Celtic roots and Gothic architecture as 'truly French' in 'avant-garde'  Cubo-Symbolist circles during the early years of the current 'century' was co-ordinated  by Robert Pelletier, founder of the Lique Celtique Franais, whose extremely  reactionary cultural programme included the promotion of medieval corporatism. In  texts such as Cubisme et la tradition (Montjoie! # 1, 1913), the painter and  nationalist functionary Albert Gleize reiterated Pelletier's prejudiced attacks  on the Italian renaissance, which both men viewed as having had a baneful  effect on France's 'Celtic' 'heritage'. Likewise, President Charles de Gaulle  sometimes quoted passages from the works of the uncle he was named after, a  Breton poet and early Pan-Celtic ideologist.
 
 Classical writers of the Posidonian  persuasion ridiculed the 'Celts' for a belief in an 'afterlife' that was so  ingrained that they'd make loans which were repayable in the 'next' world. Satire  has 'always' been used by bards to bring blisters to the cheeks of their  enemies, and even Hegel in his Aesthetics observed that satire dissolves  character. It should surprise no one that ridicule is the favoured weapon of  the avant-bard as it sets about demolishing theme park 'Britain'. Therefore,  the Neoist Alliance throws down the following challenge to Peter Berresford  Ellis, a particularly contemptible 'Celticist' who likes to pose as a 'bard' by  dressing in bed sheets. If Berresford Ellis genuinely believes his  traditionalism is superior to our conception of Celticism as a symbol of  continuous becoming, he can demonstrate his sincerity by loaning three hundred  thousand pounds to Stewart Home, with repayment of the debt to be made without  interest in the 'next' world. Regardless of how he responds to this challenge,  thanks to our ridicule Berresford Ellis will soon learn that the working class  has no country. FORWARD TO A WORLD  WITHOUT FRONTIERS!
 THE  FIRST CONGRESS OF THE NEW LETTRIST INTERNATIONAL Rather  than travelling directly to St. Andrews for the Founding Congress of the New  Lettrist International, I took a train to Dundee where I spent a pleasant  evening drinking pints of heavy in the Star And Garter on Union Street with  Marshall Anderson, curator of the Pete Horobin Data Archive. When the pub  closed we retired to the Data Attic, where drams of McClelland's Islay Single  Malt kept the conversation flowing. I didn't make it to my bed, at some point  in the wee hours I fell asleep in front of the blazing fire. To be honest, I  don't remember much of the evening, although Marshall must have mentioned early  on that McClelland's only costs £12 for a full bottle because that fact lodged  in my brain. The following quote from the McClelland's label will provide  something of the flavour of the night: "The island of Islay is a very special  place. It lies looking out westwards across the vastness of the Atlantic,  washed by the balmy waters of the Gulf Stream, and by warm, gentle rains. Islay's  landscape of lush, gold and green hue expresses the unique nature of the place:  a rich, full character which finds its echo in the rich, smokey, peaty flavours  of Islay Single Malt Scotch Whisky."
 In the morning, Marshall escorted me  to the bus station. Despite the fact that he was advertised as speaking at the  congress, Marshall took a cross country coach to Ullapool. As he departed,  Anderson declared that he much preferred the solitude of the Scottish highlands  to the hustle and bustle of formal occasions. I got on a local bus that was  delayed for nearly an hour at a roundabout just outside Tayport. A cattle truck  carrying pigs had crashed, killing several animals. The rest were herded into a  pen by the roadside. I was sitting at the front of the upper deck and thus had  a good view of the Fife Constabulary making a pig's ear of the rescue operation.  As time passed, more and more passengers came up from the lower deck to get a  better view of what was going on. The cops could have easily kept the traffic  flowing but instead simply let it jam up. The jokes about pigs and bacon were  pretty lame but a sense of community soon sprang up among those on the bus, all  of whom shared a hearty dislike of the cops.
 
 I was a couple of hours late  arriving at the Crawford Art Centre, the conference venue. Luther Blissett from  Bologna had hired a pair of paranoid schizophrenics named Prigent and O'Hara to  stage an anti-Lettrist demonstration. Blissett's intention had been to create a  scandal and thus generate press interest. As I made my way towards the  conference hall, this sad pair were being pelted with buns by a score of those  who'd come out for some fresh air during a break in congress proceedings. Prigent,  who'd drunk the better part of a bottle of meths in a bid to improve his  dialectics, or at least this was the line with which the pro-situ justified his  consumption of the spirit, was scrambling around picking up buns and eating  them. Meanwhile, O'Hara was alternating his accusations that those tormenting  him were paid agents of the secret state, with the claim that they held fascist  political sympathies. After howling that Ken Dodd was a nazi collaborator, O'Hara  denounced Luther Blissett as a state asset. Some wag pointed out that since O'Hara  had been hired to stage the anti-Lettrist demonstration by Blissett, this meant  the crazed conspiracy theorist was also in the pay of the secret state. Confronted  with the iron logic of this argument, O'Hara began rolling around on the ground  while emitting hamster-like noises, something he kept up until he was carted  off in an ambulance.
 
 Once inside, I discovered I hadn't  missed much. Harry Kipper had failed to show and so a textual submission he'd  sent along as a substitute had been read out in Esperanto. The reading was  supplemented by hand-outs of the text in English. The talk entitled The Druid  Roots Of Lettrism was pretty much what you'd expect from Kipper: "When John  Toland, the founder of modern Druidry, was criticised for contradicting himself  by claiming at various times that the 'original' Druids were engaged in human  sacrifice, were no more than peace loving sages and were patriarchs, he shot  back: 'Yes, yes, ha, ha!' This reply is remarkably similar to that given by  Marcel Janco when he was asked about his art: 'Da-da!' Toland's view of the  world was both pantheistic and materialistic. It was Catholic, Protestant,  Latitudinarian, Socinian and Deist. Towards the end of his life, Toland was  influenced by the doctrines of Giordano Bruno and Renaissance alchemy. He  summed up his philosophy with the phrases 'everything is matter' and 'everything  is movement'. Toland considered reason to be the First Law, viewing it as a ray  of light from which the revolution would flow."
 
 After Kipper's somewhat scrambled  pedantry, Florian Cramer's paper on rhetoric came as a breath of fresh air. Unfortunately,  Cramer's views are too complex to summarise here. Cramer had originally been  scheduled to speak on the second day of the congress but filled in as a  replacement for Richard Essex, who'd been detained in Manningtree by three  twenty something scooter girls, who were busily massaging his ego. By the time  a lunch break was announced, it was clear the entire structure of the  conference had been lost despite the months of planning that had gone into it. The  afternoon was taken up with video screenings because none of those  participating in the announced panel talk on cut spelling returned from the pub.  The videos were supplied by a radical film collective based in Rome and the  content was impenetrable to anyone whose Italian was anything less than  completely fluent. This meant that 90% of those present were unable to follow  the proceedings. By the end of the session, buns were being hurled at the video  projection screen.
 
 No one seemed to know what had been  arranged for Saturday evening, so most of us ended up getting plastered in a  local bar. Sunday morning began with John Zerzan arguing somewhat ironically  that the development of language marked the beginning of human alienation. He  concluded by observing that lettrism was something to be smashed rather than  encouraged. Zerzan was followed by Blaster Al Ackerman who illustrated a series  of citations from the writing of Henry Flynt with various jokes. While Flynt's  idealism floated over the heads of everyone present, the jokes divided the  audience into supportive and hostile camps. Sample joke: "Why did the feminist  cross the road? To give me a blow job." While Ackerman's humour may have been  distasteful, it did have the merit of creating heated discussion.
 
 After lunch, Stewart Home spent a  great deal of time detailing his various pranks against everything from the  literary establishment to the cops, without even so much as attempting to  relate this to lettrism. He was followed by Luther Blissett who was peddling a  similar act. Several people made comments about this pair getting too big for  their boots. Fortunately, they had the rug pulled from under their feet by the  final speaker Sadie Plant. Waving a copy of a Guardian interview which came  complete with the claim that she was 'possibly the most interesting woman in  Britain,' Sadie revealed that her cyber-feminist writings were never intended  as anything other than a hoax. "Donna Haraway is a waste of space," Plant  proclaimed, "it is time to return once more to Rosa Luxembourg and devote  ourselves to a careful reading of her works!" At this, the hall exploded into a  chorus of cheers. As Luther Blissett and Stewart Home raced up to the stage to  congratulate Sadie on out-pranking them, they were pelted with buns.
 
 So what was achieved by all of this?  Nothing very much as far as I am concerned. Sadie#s prank was well executed and  her advice about rereading the classics of left-communism is not without its  merits, but this cannot be viewed as an advance on previous positions. The New  Lettrist International may have been founded but in all other respects the  congress was a farce. Having failed to attend, Richard Essex circulated a call  for interested parties to compose imaginary reports of the event. He has  already mailed out his fictionalised account of the founding of the New  Lettrist International under the auspices of the London Psychogeographical  Association. In my opinion, rather than creating originary myths about the  founding of the NLI, we would be doing the communist movement a far better  service by subjecting ourselves to forthright criticism. It was for this reason  that I composed my report.
 
 A  report by the Unknown Neoist.
 This page reproduces the main articles from the fifth Neoist Alliance newsletter, to see the shorter texts it contained view the pdf reproduced on this website. Please note that due to difficulties with accessing the original fonts, the pdfs on this site are not identical to the original publications but only approximate them; if you wish to assess this publication from a design point of view you should view the original documents and not rely on the material available here. The jpeg on this page is scanned from an original. Re:Action 5 pdf Re:Action 4 html Re:Action 6 html Re:Action index Occulture |  Re:Action 5, Winter 1996.
 
 Royal Watch: The Image Has Cracked
 It  comes as no surprise that the revelations made in previous Royal Watch columns  have been met with complete silence from the mainstream British media. Establishment  figures know that I have written the truth and realise that if they attack my  research, this will simply serve to draw attention to it. In underground  circles, individuals in the pay of the Crown, as well as those who are simply  thick, have been heard to assert that what I write is just a joke, that it is  humour with no factual basis. These attempts to discredit me will very shortly  backfire on the idiots who have perpetrated them.
 
 Even  those who have failed to take my warnings seriously will recall that in the  first Royal Watch column I revealed the monarchy was involved in illicit drug  running operations. No one denies that the British establishment played a major  role in the opium trade of the last century, but many otherwise open minded  individuals refuse to believe that such activities are still a major source of  income for the monarchy in the nineteen-nineties. Now the mask has slipped, a  front page headline in the Sunday Times of 20/11/94 screamed "British Envoys Buy  Heroin To Lure Top Dealers". Although justifying these activities with the lie  that they are a form of detective work, enabling investigators to test how drug  trafficking networks operate, the story confirmed that 'British diplomats are  procuring millions of pounds' worth of heroin from illegal factories in  Pakistan."
 
 It is  now officially admitted that drugs are stored in embassies and diplomatic  offices 'before being flown to Britain on scheduled passenger flights.' These 'covert  imports are disclosed in correspondence between diplomats at the British high  commission in Islamabad and the director of intelligence of the Pakistan  Narcotics Control Board.' The Sunday Times story then goes on to give details  of a specific shipment of heroin that was couriered to Manchester by a Crown  official. It is therefore hardly surprising that the royal family goes to such  lengths to disguise the extent of its wealth, since much of its money comes  from a long term and ongoing involvement in the narcotics trade!
 
 Members  of the royal family enjoy the adulation their position brings, but this  visibility is also useful in diverting attention away from the real purpose of  their global tours, which is to broker drug deals and indulge their taste in  ritual human sacrifice! However, in recent years the credibility of the  monarchy has been undermined by rifts between the Queen and her children, which  led to various royal scandals being aired in public. The Queen knows that  Prince Charles has been plotting to have her ritually sacrificed in 1997, and  as a consequence, she has been fighting back tooth and claw. Charles has been  thrown to the dogs and the press can write whatever they like about him, while  mention of the Queen's extramarital love affairs remains strictly taboo.
 
 A  headline in the Times of 3/11/94 revealed that "Royal Scandals Raise Support For  Australian Republicans". This story gave the impression that it was Charles and  Diana's extramarital activities that had fuelled republicanism in the antipodes.  In fact, it is the knowledge that the entire royal family is swirling in a  cesspool of filth which has turned the sensible Aussie's against the House of  Windsor. Earlier this summer, under the headline 'Banned In Britain', Australia's  biggest selling weekly magazine Woman's Day, serialised parts of Queen  Elizabeth II: A Woman who is not Amused. Woman's Day summarised the state of  royal play with the following sentence: 'Philip's many affairs drove Elizabeth  to find solace elsewhere as Nicholas Davies reveals in his sensational new  book, in which he also tells of Diana's indiscretions and Anne's love child.'
 
 The  Queen's most significant affair, since it also entailed a huge amount of sex  magick, was with Henry George Reginald Molyneux Herbert, seventh Earl of  Carnarvon. The Earl's grandfather had discovered the tomb of Tutankhamen after  being initiated into a top occult order. Mystic secrets had been passed down  through the family, and Lizzie figured that a fling with the Earl, called 'Porchy'  by his mistress, was the easiest way of gaining his confidence and  simultaneously expanding her esoteric knowledge. The only other man with whom  the Queen is definitely known to have engaged in sex magick is Patrick Terence  William Span, 7th Baron Plunkett, although there are indications that Sir John  Miller may have played a supporting role in several of Lizzie's rites of  Satanic perversion. Clearly, the Crown is in serious trouble and if Lizzie's  affair are widely publicised in Britain, it is finished. Spread the word, their  kingdom will fall!
 First  published in Underground 5 Winter 1994.
             |